Showing posts with label sharon k.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sharon k.. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Dream Teams of the Groovy Age: It’s A Bird…It’s A Plane…It’s Swanderson!

Hey, hey, hey! Here's another groovy guest-post from Swingin' Sharon K.! Enjoy!!


Greetings, True Believers! Thought I’d toss a groovy treat your way, namely Andy Warhol’s 1981 tribute to Superman. It captures perhaps the most famous look of the Man of Steel--namely the incarnation created by that fabled entity known as Swanderson, a.k.a. Curt Swan and Murphy Anderson, that delineating duo who defined DC’s Superman in the Bronze Age and beyond. Truly, theirs was a match made in comic book art heaven!

Now I know what you’re thinking: put any competent inker to work on pencils as beautiful and clear as Swan’s, and the finished result would naturally turn out glorious, right?? Well, it’s not as easy as it seems. While it’s true over the years Swan was paired with a plethora of good inkers –Stan Kaye, John Forte, Sheldon Moldoff, Mike Esposito, Dan Adkins, and others (including two I’ll name later), not all of them were able to spotlight and enhance Swan’s singular qualities. Some, alas, buried and/or distorted the simplicity and beauty of Swan’s lines.

But DC struck gold in 1962 when George Klein was paired with Swan (yep, the same George Klein who’s acknowledged to have inked Kirby on Fantastic Four #1). Klein contoured Swan’s pencils beautifully and provided a sense of structural depth that Swan’s work had sometimes lacked when embellished by other inkers. Swan-Klein became the house style for the Superman family of comics, primarily Superman, World’s Finest (Superman-Batman) and the Legion of Super-Heroes. Unfortunately in 1968 DC dismissed several veteran freelancers, including Klein—allegedly something to do with the talent asking for with unions and benefits (a subject for another time). Klein then landed the enviable assignment of inking John Buscema on the Avengers at rival Marvel. Klein did a superlative job on Big John’s pencils, too, until he passed away—far too early—in 1969. Klein’s style was never as slick or “high tech” as, say, Joe Sinnott’s, but it was just as precise and unfussy; and it perfectly suited the often frieze-like figures and scenes created by classicists like Swan and Buscema.


Meanwhile, at the other end of the spectrum, there’s the guy who followed Klein as Swan’s chief Superman/Legion inker: Jack Abel. Now, Abel had a strong style; his slick line was distinctive and provided a surface polish, but did not always suggest mass or weight—and boy, did he like to add those huge eyelash fringes on the ladies! When paired with the right artist, Abel was magical (think Colan/Abel on Iron Man; they sure made Shellhead’s armor gleam, didn’t they?)…but on Swan, not so good. Abel’s overwhelming inks flattened Swan’s art, obscured its nuances, and rendered it, well, unSwan-like. Tell me, how much of Swan do you see in this panel from Adventure #370?


So you see inking Swan wasn’t always a slam dunk. Now let’s take a look at the gentleman whom many consider to be Swan’s definitive inker, Murphy Anderson. Anderson, who’d worked in comics since the Golden Age (he celebrated his 83rd birthday this past July), was a triple threat who could pencil, ink, or provide the complete package--full art. And you know, when you think back to some of the most striking covers of DC’s Silver Age, chances are he had a hand in them:



But wonderful as Anderson’s work in the decades prior to the Bronze Age was, it was almost just a warm up for his 1970s duet with Swan on Superman. Anderson's style is very similar to Klein's, but Anderson added even more depth and dimension to Swan’s work. In particular, it was Anderson’s facility for rendering textures—hair…musculature…civilian clothing…heck, even superhero spandex—that effectively removed the Superman cast from the fairy tale fantasyland they’d inhabited previously and brought them into the real world. Anderson made Swan’s perfect beings look human and relatable, instead of too idealized or statuesque. And not to be crass about it, but Anderson made the characters’ costumes looked like clothing and not body paint. Oh sure--there was a lot of (deserved) noise made about what people like O’Neil, Adams, Giordano, and a host of other Young Turks were doing to make stodgy ol’ DC hip and contemporary—but Anderson’s contributions can’t be discounted here; his inks on Swan’s work indisputably modernized the Superman family. This “new look” for DC’s flagship franchise helped propel the characters—and the company—into the 1970s and beyond; and it ensured their fame would continue far beyond Warhol’s proverbial 15 minutes!

Thursday, August 13, 2009

Groovy Guest Post: The Million Dollar Debut of the Fury-ous Bat Widow!

Greetings, Groove-ophiles! Here's another Groovy Guest Post via the talents of sensational Sharon K! This time we're taking a look at two of the greatest super-gals of the Groovy Age in a whole new light...

Hey, kids, remember way back in 1970, when Marvel saw the light and finally awarded one of its heroines—namely the Black Widow-- her very own ongoing feature (uh, sorry, Millie and Chili, please understand--we’re talking action mags and superheroes and all that jazz here!). But first, the House of Ideas decided Madame Natasha needed to undergo a Swan-like makeover, courtesy of John Romita, Sr.—after all Natasha had been around since 1964 but she wasn’t exactly a marquee name, so some sprucing up was in order… and it certainly wouldn’t do to have their new headliner looking like a Black Canary manqué, would it?



Romita transformed Natasha into a ravishing redheaded, her lithe, athletic form now clad in a dark, skintight bodysuit. The Widow would occasionally make use of some fancy gadgetry, but who would typically rely on nothing but her fighting prowess and her inborn smarts to battle evil and corruption…hey, you know something? --this “new” Widow sounds an awful lot like…

… that Dominoed Daredoll herself—Batgirl!


Batgirl had debuted a few years earlier over at DC, but permit me to lay some groundwork here. Back in the 1940s, there was a crime-fighting costumed heroine called Miss Fury, created by the cartoonist Tarpé Mills—herself a female…and yes, Miss Fury was the first costumed heroine to created by a female. (And Miss Fury’s exploits were presented in comic strips, and they were so popular her stories were later on collected and reprinted in comic books.) Anyway, to start at her beginning: Miss Fury is really socialite Marla Drake, who is preparing to attend a costume party when she discovers that someone else will be appearing in—horrors! —the same costume. So Drake decides to don a black panther skin she happens to have lying around (it was given to her by her uncle, an explorer). The panther outerwear happens to fit her perfectly; in fact, it hugs her every curve, as befits any self-respecting heroine. Ensconced in such form-fitting finery, Drake departs for the party but she never reaches her festive destination—instead, she battles some baddies on her way and so embarks on an exciting career as Miss Fury!

Flash forward to 1966. The Batman TV show was all the rage, the show’s creators of the Batman wanted to add a new character for girls to identify with and boys to drool over. This edict was conveyed to Carmine Infantino and so in Detective Comics #359 we’re treated to the “Million Dollar Debut of Batgirl!”


In this story, redheaded librarian Barbara Gordon is on her way to the policemen’s ball masquerade party. Her costume of choice? A figure-hugging, dusky bodysuit accented with Batman accoutrements —in other words, a “Batgirl” costume.

Wouldn’t you know it, en route to the party Barbara stumbles across some baddies. Does she contact her father, who happens to be the police commissioner? Nope; instead faster than you can say “Miss Fury”, Babs peels down to her costume and battles the bad guys on her own. She’s now Batgirl for real. (And wouldn’t you know it, she never makes it to her party.)

Flash forward again--this time to 1970-- when Romita discarded Natasha’s fishnets/bathing suit Canary combo and replaced it with an all-in-one. Sure, the popular TV Avengers Emma Peel look was all the rage back then and Peel’s fashionable jumpsuit undoubtedly influenced Romita; but as reported in the book John Romita and All That Jazz (and elsewhere), Romita states he based the Black Widow’s sleek new look on - -Miss Fury!



But now not only was the Widow’s new costume now entirely black (with the obligatory blue or gray highlights), it also boasted yellow trimmings—belt, Widow’s Bite bracelets—à la Batgirl’s belt…or insignia…or… And after years of being a raven-haired babe, all of a sudden the Widow was sporting long, red flowing locks. Maybe it was Romita’s way of paying homage to--oh, I don’t know, his beloved Mary Jane Watson…or the durable Chili…or Patsy Walker…but somehow I doubt it.

So did was Romita inspired by Miss Fury-- or Miss Fury by way of Batgirl? I know what I think—what about you?

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

Groovy Guest Post: Sharon K. on Cardy Covers

Greetings, Groove-ophiles! It's been a while since I was able to share a Groovy Guest Post with ya, but Swingin' Sharon K. (of Two Girls, a Guy, and Some Comics) has come through with a pulse-pounding post to lay on ya! In case you've been spending the last many moons in Lower Slobbovia, I'll tell ya that Sharon--aka the Silver Age Surfer--is a contributor to TwoMorrows' mildly magnificent Back Issue, and has had articles published in books like Tom Brevoot's Assembled! 2. Ol' Groove is sure you're gonna dig Sharon's post! Take it away, Sharon K.!

Cardy Covers, Part 1

Hey, wasn't Groove's recent panoply of 1969 Neal Adams covers scrumptiously mouth-watering?? And if you don't know what I'm talking about, what are you waiting for? Go here ...http://diversionsofthegroovykind.blogspot.com/2009/07/admiring-adams-40-years-ago-this-month.html

You know, while it's true that starting in 1967 Adams basically became a one-man cover industry for DC—thanks to Art (and then Editorial) Director Carmine Infantino--there were many other striking covers created by the likes of Infantino himself, Joe Kubert, and the great cover king Gil Kane. But in the late '60s-early '70s, arguably the most imaginative and well, far out DC covers were created by the inimitable Nick Cardy. His command of genres was incredible: he was equally at home doing superheroes as well as such offbeat fare as Bat Lash, The Witching Hour, and House of Secrets. It was on covers, though, that he could really let loose and exercise his artistic muscles. And Infantino, who certainly knew a good thing when he saw it, encouraged this proclivity!

As an appetizer, take a look at some Cardy covers for that grooviest of all superhero titles--the 1960s Teen Titans, natch--and take note of the recurring motifs (there'll be a quiz later):

Downstage Speedy saves the day!


Easy Riders



Wonder Chick, torn between two covers...a mere issue apart, no less!


J'accuse! (Okay, we're cheating here, 'cause this is a (cover-dated) 1970 Cardy Titans and a (cover-dated) 1971 Adams Avengers, but look how they depict similar scenarios on their covers. Was Adams perhaps a wee bit inspired by the premise of the earlier Cardy cover?


Cardy Covers, Part 2

Now it goes without saying (but I'll say it anyway since that's what a blog is for) it was Nick Cardy's Aquaman covers on which the artist was really able to go all out and strut his stuff. Cardy didn't just depict a scene from that month's story; he created tension and ambience. His use of design and pattern and his ability to make every inch of cover space interesting made Adams' "realism"--at times--look prosaic and boring (sorry, Neal!). And Cardy's covers were as inventive as Jim Steranko's, but never cold as Steranko's sometimes were. Why? Well, Cardy was a true draftsman and his gorgeous linework softened any hard edges, resulting in an almost hypnotic effect that drew the reader's eye to the whole--i.e., the drama--instead of just the pieces--the shapes, lines or colors. Gaze at Cardy's covers and you become a participant--not just an onlooker.

See for yourself--here's just a small sampling of Cardy's innovative Aquaman covers. Did this guy have a sense of design or what?!

Circles

Curves

X marks the spot

Diagonals

A couple of inverted Vs:
Stalagmites as the title. Genius.


Another classic. It's been reported an earlier (rejected) version of Cardy's illustration was even more harrowing.


Thanks again, Sharon! Ol' Groove is looking forward to what ya cook up next!

LinkWithin

Blog Widget by LinkWithin
Special thanks to Mike's Amazing World of Comics and Grand Comics Database for being such fantastic resources for covers, dates, creator info, etc. Thou art treasures true!


Note to "The Man": All images are presumed copyright by the respective copyright holders and are presented here as fair use under applicable laws, man! If you hold the copyright to a work I've posted and would like me to remove it, just drop me an e-mail and it's gone, baby, gone.


All other commentary and insanity copyright GroovyAge, Ltd.

As for the rest of ya, the purpose of this blog is to (re)introduce you to the great comics of the 1970s. If you like what you see, do what I do--go to a comics shop, bookstore, e-Bay or whatever and BUY YOUR OWN!